HomeGuide › Risk assessment template: structure to EN ISO 12100

How is a risk assessment template structured?

A risk assessment template to EN ISO 12100 is a table in which every hazard is recorded row by row: consecutive number, life phase, location and hazard zone, type of hazard from Annex B, possible consequence, risk before the measure, measure following the three-step method, risk after the measure and the remaining residual risk with a reference to the instructions for use. An empty template only provides the frame. The substantive evaluation, keeping it current and the link to the instructions for use remain the manufacturer's responsibility.

Contents
  1. What a template is for and what it has to deliver
  2. The columns of a risk assessment template
  3. The hazard categories of EN ISO 12100
  4. Filling in the template in eight steps
  5. Why a static template reaches its limits
  6. Common mistakes when filling in the template

What a template is for and what it has to deliver

The risk assessment is the mandatory basis of every CE marking. A template makes sure no hazard and no life phase is forgotten.

The risk assessment to EN ISO 12100 is the first and most important step in the CE process. The protective measures on the machine, the warnings and the residual risks in the instructions for use all follow from it. A good template makes sure this process is documented completely and traceably.

A sound template does three things:

A template is a tool, not a result. It replaces neither the technical evaluation of the specific machine nor the upkeep of the assessment over its life cycle.

The columns of a risk assessment template

This is how one row per hazard is built. These columns reflect the three-step method of risk reduction.

ColumnContent
No.Unique number of the hazard for cross-referencing, for example in the instructions for use or in test records.
Life phasePhase in the life cycle: transport, assembly, commissioning, normal operation, setting, cleaning, maintenance, fault clearance, dismantling, disposal.
Location / hazard zoneThe specific point on the machine where the hazard occurs, for example a drawing-in point, the control cabinet, the tool area.
HazardType of hazard following the categories of EN ISO 12100, Annex B: mechanical, electrical, thermal, noise, vibration, radiation, materials and substances, ergonomics, environment, combination.
Possible consequenceConceivable injury or damage to health, for example crushing, electric shock, burns, hearing damage.
Risk before measureRisk estimate from severity of harm and probability of occurrence (frequency, possibility of avoidance), before any protective measure.
Measure (three-step method)The risk reduction decided on, in order of priority: 1. inherently safe design, 2. safeguarding, 3. information for use.
Risk after measureRenewed evaluation once the measure has been implemented. If it is not sufficient, another iteration of risk reduction follows.
Residual risk / reference to instructionsThe remaining residual risk and the corresponding warning in the instructions for use, with a reference to the chapter or pictogram.

The hazard categories of EN ISO 12100

Annex B of EN ISO 12100 lists the types of hazard. Working through the template along these categories means fewer hazards are missed.

Filling in the template in eight steps

This is how to work through a risk assessment template to EN ISO 12100 systematically.

Determine the limitsSet the limits of the machine: limits of use, spatial and time limits, intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse.
List the life phasesRecord every life phase, from transport and assembly through operation to maintenance and disposal, and set up a separate examination for each phase.
Identify the hazardsFor each phase and hazard zone, work through the hazards along the categories of Annex B and enter them into the template row by row.
Estimate the riskFor each hazard, evaluate the risk before the measure from the severity of the possible harm and the probability of occurrence.
Decide on the measureReduce the risk in the order of the three-step method: first inherently safe design, then safeguarding, and only then information for use.
Re-evaluate the residual riskEvaluate the risk after the measure again. If it is still too high, improve the measure and repeat the evaluation (iteration).
Document the residual riskRecord the remaining residual risks and link them to the corresponding warning in the instructions for use.
Check and releaseReview the complete assessment, date it, release it and archive it as part of the technical documentation.

Why a static template reaches its limits

An empty spreadsheet or word processor template is a good start. As a permanent working tool for several machines it soon shows weaknesses.

Currency

Standards and legal bases change. From 20 January 2027 the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies with no transition period. A static template ages quietly: it points to outdated references without anyone noticing.

Reuse

For a product line or similar machines, many people copy the file and adapt it. That creates version confusion and overlooked changes. A row copied from an old project often does not fit the new machine.

Consistency

If every person evaluates severity and probability by feel, assessments become incomparable. Without stored criteria and standard wording, traceability suffers.

Link to the instructions for use

The residual risk in row 27 of the table and the warning in the instructions for use sit in separate files. If the assessment changes, the warning easily stays as it was. These are exactly the breaks that market surveillance notices.

Common mistakes when filling in the template

These mistakes make a risk assessment vulnerable, even when the table looks complete.

Only normal operation consideredMaintenance, cleaning, fault clearance and setting are forgotten. It is precisely in these phases that safeguards are often bypassed and the risk is highest.
Measures in the wrong orderInstead of safe design, a warning is reached for straight away. The three-step method requires a design solution first, then technical measures, and only then information.
Risk after the measure not re-evaluatedThe column stays empty or is merely asserted. Without a renewed evaluation there is no evidence that the measure reduces the risk sufficiently.
Template taken from an old projectRows from another machine are copied unchanged. The hazard zones, evaluations and residual risks then do not fit the specific machine.
Residual risks with no follow-throughResidual risks appear in the table but not in the instructions for use. The chain of hazard, measure and warning breaks off.
No date and no releaseWithout a date, a version and a responsible person, it is impossible to tell which state applies. When the machine is modified, the reference point is missing.

Sources and standards

Editions of standards and their harmonised status change continuously. Check standard numbers and editions against the current list in the Official Journal of the EU before applying them. This article is a technical classification and does not replace legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a legally prescribed template for the risk assessment?

No. Neither the Machinery Directive nor the Machinery Regulation prescribes a particular form. What is prescribed is the procedure to EN ISO 12100: identify hazards, estimate the risk, reduce it and document the result traceably. The tabular template is the form commonly used in practice to do that.

Which columns does a risk assessment template have to contain?

The established set is: consecutive number, life phase, location and hazard zone, type of hazard, possible consequence, risk before the measure, measure following the three-step method, risk after the measure, and residual risk with a reference to the instructions for use. This structure reflects the required chain from hazard to residual-risk information.

Which hazard categories does EN ISO 12100 set out?

Annex B of EN ISO 12100 names mechanical, electrical and thermal hazards among others, as well as hazards from noise, vibration, radiation, materials and substances, ergonomic hazards, hazards from the environment and the combination of several hazards. Working through the template along these categories reduces the risk of missing a hazard.

How do I evaluate the risk in the template?

The risk follows from the severity of the possible harm and the probability of its occurrence. The probability is made up of the frequency and duration of exposure, the probability of the harmful event occurring and the possibilities of avoidance. What matters is applying the same criteria to every row, so the evaluations stay comparable.

What does the three-step method mean in the measures column?

The three-step method of risk reduction to EN ISO 12100 sets the order of measures: first inherently safe design, then safeguarding and complementary protective measures, and last information for use such as warnings and statements in the instructions. The template should make clear which step a given measure belongs to.

Is a spreadsheet template enough for the risk assessment?

For a single, manageable machine a carefully completed table can be enough. With several machines, product lines or frequent changes a static file reaches its limits: currency, version control, consistent evaluation and the link to the instructions for use are all hard to secure.

How are residual risk and instructions for use connected?

Every residual risk that remains after the protective measures has to be communicated to the user in the instructions for use, for example as a warning or a pictogram. In the template, the residual risk column with its reference to the instructions makes sure this connection is documented and updated when things change.

Do I have to set up a separate examination for each life phase?

Yes. EN ISO 12100 requires all life phases of the machine to be considered, from transport, assembly and commissioning through normal operation, setting and cleaning to maintenance, fault clearance, dismantling and disposal. Many serious accidents happen outside normal operation, which is why the life phase column is central.

Does the Machinery Regulation change anything about the risk assessment from 2027?

The procedure to EN ISO 12100 remains the core. The Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies from 20 January 2027 with no transition period and adds requirements, for instance on protection against corruption and on AI and autonomous functions. Templates and references should be updated to the Regulation.

Heinrich Knutas
Heinrich Knutas
Machinery safety engineer
Founder of Kaidoc.app · CEO of Knutec.de · LinkedIn

Has been guiding CE projects in machinery, plant and special purpose engineering for years. That work led to Kaidoc.app, a software for standards-based CE documentation. Through Knutec.de the same work is available as a personal service.

Still have a question?

Write me a few lines about your project. You get a first assessment back, free of charge and without obligation.

This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed for technical accuracy before publication. Editorial responsibility within the meaning of Art. 50(4) of the AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 lies with Heinrich Knutas.

Do it yourself or have it done
Instructions for use, risk assessment and EU declaration of conformity under Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230. With Kaidoc.app you create the documents yourself, structured along the standards instead of copied together from past projects. If time is short, Knutec.de takes the project on as a service.
All mandatory chapters in placeStandards and deadlines kept currentWord and PDF, fully editable
Start 30-day free trial

No credit card required. A complete project to try out.

Related articles

How do you produce a risk assessment for a machine? How does a risk assessment to EN ISO 12100 work? What does software for risk assessment actually do?
© 2026 Knutec · GDPR compliant · Servers in Germany Home Guide Contact